close
Develop, support, promote disability leaders

Tag Archive: disability leadership

  1. Ripples

    Ripples forming on the surface of water.

    Ripples

    Celebrating a decade of disability leadership

    By Christina Ryan DLI CEO

     

    How do you measure the ripples that a single thought creates?

    A decade ago I had an idea. What might happen if we created a space where disability leadership was given the attention it deserved? What might happen if disabled people had somewhere to go for their leadership development that wasn’t just a once off program or a passing government policy, but a constant presence?

    What might happen if we put the two words disability and leadership together in a sentence?

    Ten years later we are starting to find out, but we’ve only just begun.

    It is easy to quantify the hundreds of disability leaders who have attended Disability Leadership Institute programs and coaching. It is easy to count the number of members the DLI has welcomed in a decade. It is also easy to count the growing number of organisations who have come to the DLI searching for disabled talent for their vacancies or asking for an inhouse leadership program, but none of these tell us what change has happened or the impact that the DLI has made.

    How far does a ripple go when a small pebble is dropped in a wide ocean?

    How much light does a tiny spark create in a very dark night?

    The real impact of the Disability Leadership Institute is unquantifiable.

    The term disability leadership has gone from nonexistence to being used widely by community, government, business and academia. Using those two words together has also sparked conversations and awareness, leading to more and more organisations delivering in house disability leadership programs and searching specifically for more disabled talent.

    Organisations tell the DLI that their disability leadership programs have resulted in growth in the number of people being openly disabled at work. When being disabled is a criteria for participation, people feel valued by their employers and there is suddenly a reason to be open. Rather than disability being all about the organisation and its statistics, it becomes about career paths and being wanted.

    How do you measure the career impact for people who have undertaken DLI programs or coaching that changed their perception of their career to understanding that senior leadership was possible for them? Where are they all now?

    Something the DLI never planned for is the DLI members community. Ten years ago the idea of having a self funded professional network of disability leaders was laughable. Half of all disabled people survive on welfare and don’t have enough money to live on. The half that are in paid employment are often on low incomes or insecure incomes with little money to spare. Yet, somehow, the DLI membership has grown into the largest professional network of disability leaders in Australia.

    The DLI members community stretches across all Australian states and territories, with several international members because there is no other organisation like this anywhere on the planet. DLI members are at all career stages, they come from a very diverse range of professions and industries, and they have one thing in common – they are all disabled people who have finally found somewhere that they can connect with other people like them. People who have gone from being the only one in their workplace to being part of a community of professionals facing similar challenges, a similar sense of isolation, and have faced the same barriers to career advancement.

    The DLI members community has become a powerful professional network that has connected people who would never otherwise have met. Those connections resulted in a collaboration that changed the Fair Work Australia resources on disability, produced partnerships between entrepreneurs to work with some of our leading universities on access planning, and provided countless openings for positions on boards. DLI members have introduced each other to organisations and resources that have changed career directions and provided speaking and profile opportunities that led to advancement.

    Through the DLI members community there is a growing expectation that disabled people should be appointed to executive level and board positions. DLI members alert each other to opportunities, have coached each other in applying for jobs, and helped each other prepare for interviews.

    Disability leadership has also become a field of research, particularly by disabled academics and policy specialists. As increasing numbers of disabled people move into professional spaces and advance to senior positions, there is a growing awareness that the way we do leadership is different. This matters and it needs to be understood and documented.

    How do you measure the impact of the ripples created by a single idea a decade ago?

    The DLI dropped a pebble in an ocean. Its first ten years saw the ripples created embed the concept of disability leadership, open a space, and establish a community. Now DLI members are riding those ripples into new oceans and changing the way leadership is understood.

     

    Sign up for regular updates from the Disability Leadership Institute. 

    Christina Ryan is the CEO of the Disability Leadership Institute, which provides professional development and support for disability leaders. She identifies as a disabled person. 

     

  2. Staying

    A large deeply rooted tree with massive spreading branches, it is covered in lichen and moss.

    Staying

    Moving to a new job is high risk

    by Christina Ryan DLI CEO

    The decision to apply for a new job and progress your career is an exciting one. Recognising that it’s time to stretch yourself into a bigger skill set and explore new fields and ways of doing things, should be something everyone experiences.

    What happens when it’s too much to contemplate? When progressing your career or changing jobs, for whatever reason, is something that fills you with trepidation and exhaustion?

    Starting a new job is a major event for any person, but for disability leaders it can be particularly complex. For those who require adjustments, including flexible arrangements, it can also be a time of apprehension and doubt.

    Recent discussions with disability leaders have pointed to a common concern; changing jobs means leaving the arrangements already in place and starting all over again. Repeating the long labour of being granted hard won adjustments or flexibility, and the even longer labour of educating your colleagues about specific measures you might need – like captions in meetings, larger font emails, or quiet zones and muted lighting – so that you can do your job effectively.

    Disability leaders talk about wanting to change jobs, yet to change jobs is to risk losing the mechanisms that have been put in place, and which may have taken months or years to establish.

    Additionally, changing jobs also means moving further into the unknown and potentially experiencing unsafe conditions in the new position. It is a high risk business, and the more senior the disability leader the greater the risk. Few senior disability leaders are open about their disabilities, and a move is a big gamble that can be career ending if the new workplace isn’t supportive.

    Being open in one workplace doesn’t mean it’s safe to be open in the next workplace, but once that door has been opened there is no going back.

    Moving jobs means revisiting the need to build trust, the emotional labour of educating colleagues about disability and about your disability specifically, and it can also mean enduring quite intrusive questions and an expectation that you must explain your personal circumstances and justify why you need solutions that are different to what is currently available.

    In recent conversations, a number of disability leaders have shared their decision that now is not the time to dive into this uncertainty, and they have made the difficult choice to stay in a position that is limiting their career advancement. They know it will take substantial time and energy to go through a transition process, on top of the usual shifts in routine that a new job presents to everyone. That level of effort is only possible when there are no other major challenges going on, and for many disability leaders there are often other major challenges going on.

    Disability leaders are faced with two stark alternatives: take the big risk to follow your career and hope your vital workplace arrangements can be locked in without too much effort or stick with what you know even though it might be career limiting.

     

    Thanks to the many DLI members who shared thoughts and experiences for this article.

    Sign up for regular updates from the Disability Leadership Institute. 

    Christina Ryan is the CEO of the Disability Leadership Institute, which provides professional development and support for disability leaders. She identifies as a disabled person

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  3. DLI Members in the news – December 2024

    Caroline Bowditch – 2024 Sidney Myer Creative Fellows Announced

    Megan Spindler Smith – PWDA Welcomes National Action Plan For LGBTIQA+ Health And Wellbeing, Calls For Strong Implementation

    Shane Hryhorec – Video Podcast: The fight for disability rights on flights

    Shane Hryhorec – ‘Sky is the limit’: the untapped potential of accessible tourism in Australia

    Katie Kelly – Parker’s Paralympic Gold Leads Aussie Triathlon’s Night of Nights

    Katie Kelly – Historic Champions Jacobs and Kelly Join Triathlon’s Greatest

    Matt Warren – Awards Celebrate Victorian Work On Disability Inclusion

    Shane Hryhorec – ‘Enough is enough’, say aviation disability advocates

    Kat Reed – Our Lives,Our Voices – shaping the future through voice, power, identity and self-direction.

    Shane Hryhorec – Govt Must Ensure Disabled Airline Access, Not Airlines

    Shane Hryhorec – ‘Enough is enough’: Disability advocates call for air travel to be more accessible

    Kat Reed – DISABILITY FOUNDATIONAL WORK NEEDS COMMUNITY FUNDING

    Alastair McEwin, Megan Spindler Smith – Voice Of Our Own Online National Conference

    Megan Spindler Smith – Outback beekeeper looks to hire NDIS clients

    Emma Bennison – Meet the recipient of the Lesley Hall Lifetime Achievement Award

    Morwenna Collett – Musically able: music from composers and performers with disability connected to Sydney

    Simon Darcy – Are airlines failing in their duty of care to people with disabilities?

    Christina Ryan – Why aren’t there more disabled people in leadership roles?

    Disability Leadership Institute – Breaking barriers: Elevating disability leadership for a more inclusive future

    Kat Reed – COMMUNITY TAKES DISABILITY DAY LEAD

    Carly Findlay – “Resilience and strength”: IDPwD highlights value disabilities

    Emma Bennison, Disability Leadership Institute – SBS midday news bulletin

    Disability Leadership Institute – ABC features stories by, for, and about Australians living with disability

    Disability Leadership Institute – Enhancing disability representation in leadership

    Emma Olivier – Why we need more people with disability in leadership

    Gemma Smart – International Day of Persons with Disabilities: community and action

    Carly Findlay – Sensitivity readers: why do we need them?

    Sarah Langton – What does the future hold for the NDIS – and its participants?

    Disability Leadership Institute – Deaf defying: disability leadership as an act of resistance — with Dr Scott Avery
    The Disability Leadership Oration

    Megan Spindler Smith – PWDA Urges Gov’t to End ADEs After Rapporteur Call

    Shane Hryhorec – Traumatic reason Aussie passenger ‘will never cruise’ with MSC again

  4. Meaning well doesn’t equal inclusion

    This month we are revisiting an article from February 2020:

    Meaning well doesn’t equal inclusion

    Real inclusion takes action as well as good intentions.

    by Christina Ryan DLI CEO

    A group of disabled people in a circle at a conference. Some are in wheelchairs, they are talking together.

    It’s unusual to meet someone who doesn’t think it’s a good idea to employ disabled people, or to be working towards an inclusive workplace.

    So, why is it still so hard to find good workplaces that are inclusive where disabled people feel comfortable and stay for the long haul? Why have the statistics on disability employment stagnated for decades, or gone backwards?

    Because everybody thinks they’re doing something, and very few are.

    Disability Leadership Institute (DLI) members recently shared their experiences of workplace inclusion. They identified that workplaces still aren’t getting inclusion right, with a continuing lack of real action, and despite many workplaces claiming they are inclusive.

    There is no doubt employers mean well, but is meaning well enough to get inclusion over the line? Unfortunately not. Meaning well doesn’t equate to action, and it is real action that is needed.

    DLI members had several comments and suggestions for getting inclusion right across a range of workplace touch points. Many of these suggestions come from managers of teams, CEOs, and highly qualified disabled people struggling to find work. All the suggestions are from disabled people as both practitioners of inclusion and participants in inclusive processes.

    Inclusion needs to start at the beginning, during recruitment, and continue as an ongoing focus for management and leadership every day. Complacency is not an option. Never assume your organisation is fully inclusive, nor that you have no further work to do. There is always more to be done, just as there are always more ways of being inclusive, because diverse people are diverse and each person must be treated as an individual.

    Recruitment:

    • Contacting people before their recruitment interview, or appraisal process, to ask what adjustments need to be made and then making those adjustments
    • Making sure interviewers can respond to questions about workplace adjustments at interview
    • Ensuring interviews are accessible so that people can focus on their interview and not their disability needs
    • Ensuring people are confident and comfortable asking for adjustment during the recruitment phase, this means having an accessible recruitment process
    • Providing questions before interview, meeting interview panel members beforehand, or not even having a formal interview process
    • Openly seeking disabled people for your workforce

    Human Resources:

    • Ensuring there are disabled people working in human resources, and valuing the expert contribution of those staff
    • Asking all staff how they like to work/communicate and then creating shared profiles with that information, so everyone knows that everyone one else has particular strengths and preferences
    • Collecting data on diversity numbers and length of employment, including how many people openly identify as disabled

    Management:

    • Taking organisation level policies and applying them at team level
    • Ongoing conversations amongst team members which may lead to flexible work arrangements on where and how work is done
    • Doing regular things like staff meetings and team gatherings in open reflective ways

    Leadership:

    • Leadership leading by example, making sure all team members are checked on as part of daily routines to avoid exclusion and cliques developing
    • Maintaining an open conversation about gaps in inclusion and openly working to address those gaps
    • Workplaces claiming to be diverse should be planning, providing funding and seeking counsel for success in diversity, just as they would any other part of their business mission

    Finally, and rather obviously: having more than good intentions by actually employing disabled people. Many organisations say that employing disabled people is a good thing to do, yet half of all disabled people remain unemployed.

    Clearly good intentions are not good enough. Workplaces need to mean it and that means action.

    Action starts from recruitment and continues throughout the organisation as part of daily operations. Action means policies, processes and an ongoing conversation about what inclusion looks like for this team.

    Action also means management openly taking responsibility for addressing inclusion gaps as a leadership example.

    Inclusion will look different for every team, because every team is different; however, there are some structural underpinnings that can be considered for any organisation that wishes to be inclusive, as well as being seen to be inclusive.

     

    Thanks to the many DLI members who shared thoughts and experiences for this article.

    Sign up for regular updates from the Disability Leadership Institute. 

    Christina Ryan is the CEO of the Disability Leadership Institute, which provides professional development and support for disability leaders. She identifies as a disabled person

  5. Power, productivity, disability leadership. SDAC2024

    Long room shot of the SDAC conference from the back of the room, with the Christina on the stage up the front.

    Keynote speech by Christina Ryan DLI CEO to the Strengthening Disability Advocacy Conference, 19 September 2024.

     

    I acknowledge the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin Nation, whose beautiful country we are gathering on today. I also acknowledge other First Nations folk who are here with us.

    We are at a crossroads in the disability rights movement. Many big processes have concluded and left many of us are asking whether these processes have taken us forward or back. We have also seen a shift in the disability advocacy sector and how it works.

    We’ve had several years of major processes and reforms, including the Royal Commission, the NDIS review, the registered provider inquiry, more reviews of the advocacy sector, and most recently the NDIS legislation process. This has all been happening alongside our usual work of implementing the CRPD, engaging with the United Nations, and keeping in touch with our international colleagues about latest developments. A lot has been going on.

    Many of us felt deflated with the government’s underwhelming response to the Royal Commission. We waited a long time for the government to work out how it would respond, and ultimately, they couldn’t even accept the recommendation that disabled people should be consulted. It has left a lot of people asking where to from here?

    Disabled people fought hard for the Royal Commission. We then committed a lot of trust and energy to making sure it was the best we could make it. Then our various governments, state and federal, couldn’t find the courage to use it as a catalyst. Rather they seem to have found it awkward and inconvenient. Then other processes were forced upon us, sometimes with very short timeframes like the NDIS legislation changes, and we once again engaged in those reviews and legislative reforms to do the best for our community to move things forward in a positive direction.

    It has been very difficult to see if we are achieving any real change with these processes. It is always hard to see change when we are right in the middle of things, when we are working flat out at the coalface every day doing our best to make things happen, but ultimately these processes have all contributed to change, some of it big and some of it incremental.

    Let’s pull back to the bigger picture; our disability rights movement is about equality and how we are getting equal. So, what has been happening there? How have all these processes been making a difference to disabled people getting equal? Are we really implementing the CRPD?

    Power

    When I look back over the last decade one big change becomes obvious: disabled people are now expected to be in the room. A decade ago, we were knocking politely and asking that disabled people be part of the conversation, that we be a part of discussions about how our lives looked and how much we controlled them. I look back to the NDIS build process and recall that many of the working groups had one single disabled person on them, and often we had to fight to have that one disabled person in the room.

    Disabled people now have power that we have never had before. We have gone from asking to be in the room, to expecting to be in the room. Sure, we are yet to be there in the numbers we should be, and we are rarely if ever there as the key policy designers and decision makers. We are not yet there as government ministers or heads of departments. We still have only 4 openly disabled parliamentarians across the 950, or so, members of Australian parliaments state and federal.

    However, no process about disability is considered legitimate today unless disabled people are there. Our voices are stronger than ever. We have developed our own power.

    What I am not seeing is the disability community using our power consciously or deliberately. Somehow, we are still tapping politely on doors and asking to have a say, just like we did a decade ago. It’s time to stop this, to recognise that we do have power and to start expecting to be part of the big conversations. Every disabled person in this room today has power and I would like to see you using it.

    We have colleagues fighting right now insisting that the new CEO of Vision Australia is from the blind and vision impaired community. United Blind Leaders have circulated an open letter insisting that a transparent and accountable process is undertaken to achieve this.[1] You can sign it at change.org. (Update: the day before the conference, Vision Australia announced that it would change its recruitment process and also include being blind or vision impaired as a desirable selection criteria.)

    The Deaf President Now campaign at Gallaudet University of the Deaf back in the 1980s was the result of many individuals standing up and saying, “we do not accept degraded status”.[2] They succeeded in getting the first Deaf person appointed as chair of the university board, because they refused to accept anything less.

    Our New Zealand colleagues were appalled in 2022 when the head of the new Ministry of Disabled People was announced, and it wasn’t a disabled person. They fought hard for this ministry and did not want to see it going the way of other disability specific agencies. So, they refused to accept the appointment. They let the government know that the appointment wasn’t legitimate or credible and insisted that a disabled person be appointed. Within a few days the appointment was renamed as “interim” while a disabled person was found, and you bet they found one!

    And who can forget Stop The Tram? A campaign that has recently been revived started in Melbourne in the 1990s to get accessible trams and stops. This campaign was an outstanding example of disabled people using our power to make change. A whole heap of people chained themselves to the front of Bourke Street trams in flash protests that held up traffic for hours. It changed a lot of things, including the national transport standards. Many of us now enjoy an accessible inner city Melbourne tram system as a result.

    Throughout history, those in power have never given it away. Power is not ceded by those who have it. When it changes hands, it is because others have stepped forward, moved alongside and taken it. If disabled people want equality, if we want to be in the rooms of decision making about our lives then we must recognise our power, own it and start using it.

    When we see appointments being made to disability specific or relevant roles, it is within our power to accept or reject those appointments. It is up to us to insist that disabled people are appointed to run our organisations, our service providers, our offices of disability, and to the various statutory appointments like commissioners for disability or heading our regulatory agencies like the safeguards commission. If we really want equality, it is also time we got into the parliaments and into the cabinet rooms.

    When non-disabled people are appointed, we can say: “no, go back and do better.” Just as our forebears have done in various campaigns, we can reject others speaking for us or being in positions of power that make decisions about our lives.

    We can also start saying no when policy or processes are not acceptable to us. When governments tell us they will only accept 13 of the Royal Commission’s recommendations we have the power to say: “no, go back and do better.” Not good enough.

    Disability advocacy has also evolved. We have reached a point where it has become offensive for anyone other than disabled people to speak for disabled people. This includes frontline individual advocates, who now work using a rights based approach and understand that they do not speak “for” a person, but rather are there to support a disabled person to be heard, in line with the CRPD expectation of support being provided so that a disabled person can engage in a particular system or process.

    Our allies have become those who step back and make space for us to be in the room, to be heard, to be respected as equals. Our allies help us to do our work, hep us to be strong, support us to show up. They have our backs and make our work possible. In the disability community allies do vital work that makes it possible for disabled people to do our work getting equal, but they do not and cannot do our work. They do not have the expertise of lived experience.

    Those who are not our allies, who are not creating space, are not supporting us and putting us forward are lagging behind and it’s time for them to go back, have a think and come back when they are ready to do better.

    Disabled people are no longer prepared to ask, we now expect those who are making decisions that affect us to be us.

    Productivity

    Australia is having a productivity crisis. For at least 20 years we have been struggling to improve our international competitiveness. For even longer we have been towards the back of the OECD pack when it comes to disability employment. I sometimes wonder if solving disability employment might not also assist with improving our international competitiveness and productivity.[3]

    Australia needs our disabled people to be part of fulfilling our potential as a country. This isn’t just a buzz phrase; it is a serious economic problem. Around one fifth of the Australian population struggles to find work and struggles to build careers in our chosen fields. With around 5 million Australians with disability, we are talking big numbers who are not contributing as we would like to.

    Disabled people are needed, and yet we are shut out from being part of the solution. We don’t just find it hard to get work, we are rarely seen in any senior leadership positions, whether it is in the public, private or community sector. We must start with our advocacy organisations and our service providers, while also looking at any government position related to disability. If disabled people are not being appointed, we should be asking why, reject the appointments, and send recruiters back to do better. This needs to happen for the country, not just for us and getting equal.

    Reputable studies have shown that disabled people are 10 per cent more innovative in the workplace than the people we work alongside.[4]

    A more recent study showed that when disabled people are team leaders and supervisors, our teams are far more productive.[5] When those teams are also largely teams of disabled people, they become even more productive.

    So why isn’t Australia going full pelt on building our disability leadership and our disability workforce, right across all sectors?

    For at least the last 3 decades the Australian policy push has been for entry level employment. What I call the “get a job” policy. Yet, various studies show that to generate culture change and build more inclusive workplaces you need diverse leadership. Studies also show that disability leadership provides for greater innovation and productivity.

    Disabled people aren’t superhuman, but we do see things differently and we are outstanding problem solvers. We are great at finding workarounds and making systems work. Disability leaders are masters of flexibility and adaptability to circumstance. If you want something done, a disability leader will find a way to do it.

    We also know that diverse leadership is the key to building and sustaining a diverse workforce. Yet, for some reason Australia is lousy at appointing disabled people to senior positions, whether it be in government, corporate, community or academic sectors. Everyone seems to be talking diversity; except they keep forgetting disability diversity. When they do talk disability diversity, they don’t mean leadership, they mean entry level. Yet it is when we have disabled people in leadership positions that productivity and innovation increase. Why isn’t Australia getting the message?

    Well let’s make sure it does.

    We need disabled people across all fields, across all sectors, and in our parliaments. That means you, me, all of us. This must become our frontier work, the tough and difficult job of being the first, and often only, disabled person in your workplace or at your level, but it must be done. The job of the disability rights movement is to support each other as we infiltrate all of these systems, workplaces, and institutions. It’s a long game and it is going to be a tough fight, but it’s one we must take on to tackle the continuing ableism and prejudice that continues to govern our lives.

    More and more disabled people are being open about their disability at work, and we must recognise how hard it still is for people to be doing this. By backing each other through our networks, our community and our professional organisations like the Disability Leadership Institute we can make it easier for the next person and the one after that.

    When people on the inside are unable to speak out, our advocates and change makers can. We are going to need both contributions to get to where we are going. The disability rights movement is big and diverse, and it is going to take all of us, across all of our intersectional spaces, to get to the equality we are looking for.

    We can start by saying no and expecting better.

    It is time we expected to be in board rooms, executive offices and in parliaments as decision makers, not just about disability but right across all fields because that is what Australia really needs if we are going to be a powerhouse 21st century economy.

    Disabled people are in a very different position to where we were a decade ago. We now have power and a voice, and we must learn how to use it. It is time we told the organisations and governments that affect our lives to go back and start doing better.

    Thank you

     

    [1] https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/aug/31/vision-australia-pressed-to-appoint-a-blind-ceo-and-open-field-externally

    [2] https://gallaudet.edu/museum/history/the-deaf-president-now-dpn-protest/

    [3] https://www.ceda.com.au/newsandresources/opinion/economy/why-australia-critically-needs-a-productivity-push

    [4] https://hbr.org/2017/12/the-case-for-improving-work-for-people-with-disabilities-goes-way-beyond-compliance

    [5] https://theconversation.com/job-supervisors-with-disabilities-can-boost-productivity-new-research-shows-236764

  6. From the room next door (revisited)

     

    A row of several white doors in a corridor

    By Christina Ryan DLI CEO

     

    Disabled people are consigned to the room next door.

     

    Disability leadership happens in the rooms next door.

    Few disabled people are in positions of power and decision making; we rarely sit on the boards, in the parliaments, or on the executive teams, even when disability is the central issue being discussed. Disability leaders are consigned to advisory groups and must tap politely on the door to be heard, waiting for the moment when it suits those inside.

    Recently, Disability Leadership Institute members have been discussing anger and being angry. It seems many of us are angry a lot of the time. Being angry is a natural consequence of being constantly marginalised and told you do not belong, you don’t fit. Anger is also what happens when we see injustice all around us.

    We tap politely on the door and ask to be remembered:

    – when pandemic plans are being formulated;

    – when vaccination is being rolled out;

    – when we require adjustments at work;

    – we tap politely so that we can participate equally in meetings; and,

    – when policy about our services is being designed.

    Yet we are consistently ignored, told others know best, or just forgotten.

    Disability leaders consistently see non-disabled people speaking for us; we notice the issues we raise are not listened to; and we see disabled people being harmed or dying because of gaps in policy and action. DLI members have talked about becoming angry, and then being told to be polite, to be nice when raising critical issues, otherwise we will not be listened to.

    Denying the anger of someone is a way of shutting them down. It is a form of silencing. It has become a tool of the privileged inside the room, used to marginalise those who are outside. Rather than show leadership by listening to anger, and understand the causes of that anger, those in power and authority close inward and suggest we are emotional or hysterical. Our anger is turned back upon us as a weakness that proves we are incapable of leadership or clarity.

    Anger is not aggression, nor is being angry rude. We are told we should not be angry, yet it is only when we become angry that our experience of discrimination and marginalisation becomes clear to others. Our anger is rejected and silenced by those who have marginalised our voices and our expertise. The privilege of rejecting anger belongs to those who get to decide what is listened to and what is not. These are unlikely to be disabled people because disabled people are rarely in positions of power and authority. Disabled people are consigned to the room next door.

    Why should disability leaders be silent about the levels of violence we see, or about being forgotten in pandemic policy, or being deprioritised in the vaccination rollout, or when poor government policy is imposed upon us, or when we are overlooked for senior appointments yet again?

    Being angry does not mean being rude, although it is sometimes interpreted this way. Being angry does not mean being aggressive, although it is often interpreted this way by those we are raising issues with. Being angry does not mean being destructive, although we are often trying to deconstruct systems of oppression when expressing anger.

    Disability leaders are highly constructive about being angry about violence, marginalisation, oppression, and the deaths of members of our community through poor policy or inaction. We are experts in using our anger to make a difference; recognising its impact and making it count. We are experts in being polite about being in the room next door, left out of decision making with our expertise unrecognised. Anger has become a necessary part of how we do leadership.

    Our anger can make others uncomfortable, but it is through our anger that those in positions of power and authority (the people inside the room) realise that we do not accept what they are saying, or the consequences of leaving us in the room next door. We do not accept their discrimination. Our anger threatens their power and authority, it reminds them that their decisions are poor, and their expertise is lacking.

    This anger will not subside until we no longer need to tap politely on the door, until we are part of decision making and policy development, until we sit inside the rooms of power and authority. Until we are equal.

    (This article is revisited, it was first published by the DLI in 2021).

     

    Sign up for regular updates from the Disability Leadership Institute. 

    Christina Ryan is the CEO of the Disability Leadership Institute, which provides professional development and support for disability leaders. She identifies as a disabled person